Skip to content

Preparation of loo release 2.10#375

Open
florence-bockting wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
release-2.10
Open

Preparation of loo release 2.10#375
florence-bockting wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
release-2.10

Conversation

@florence-bockting

@florence-bockting florence-bockting commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR prepares the loo release 2.10.
See file notes-release.md for further information.

TODOS

  • update DESCRIPTION (version, date)
  • update NEWS.md
  • update release notes in GitHub based on updated NEWS.md
  • run reverse dependency checks
    • see further information in Comment
  • run withr::with_envvar(c("NOT_CRAN" = "true"), devtools::check_mac_release())
  • run withr::with_envvar(c("NOT_CRAN" = "true"), devtools::check_win_devel())
  • update cran-comments.md (send to Jonah)
  • inform flocker author about release
  • update date in DESCRIPTION file when doing the release

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.70%. Comparing base (57aab3e) to head (7710485).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #375   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.70%   92.70%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        3029     3029           
=======================================
  Hits         2808     2808           
  Misses        221      221           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 7710485 is merged into master:

  • ✔️loo_function: 1.88s -> 1.88s [-0.2%, +0.46%]
  • ✔️loo_matrix: 1.65s -> 1.65s [-0.42%, +0.19%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@florence-bockting

florence-bockting commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Note on reverse dependency checks:

The following packages failed to install when using revdepcheck::revdep_check(), therefore I created a fork of each package and run devtools::check() locally using loo version 2.10 as dependency. All packages passed the tests:

  • bayesdfa
  • footBayes
  • TriDimRegression
  • pcFactorStan
  • rtmpt

@florence-bockting florence-bockting requested a review from jgabry June 16, 2026 11:00
@florence-bockting florence-bockting marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2026 12:36
@florence-bockting

florence-bockting commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Output of withr::with_envvar(c("NOT_CRAN" = "true"), devtools::check_mac_release()):

* using log directory '/Volumes/PkgBuild/work/1782110718-279f6c629fe09119/packages/sonoma-arm64/results/4.6/loo.Rcheck'
* using R version 4.6.0 Patched (2026-04-24 r89963)
* using platform: aarch64-apple-darwin23
* R was compiled by
    Apple clang version 17.0.0 (clang-1700.3.19.1)
    GNU Fortran (GCC) 14.2.0
* running under: macOS Tahoe 26.5.1
* using session charset: UTF-8
* current time: 2026-06-22 06:45:39 UTC
* checking for file 'loo/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* checking extension type ... Package
* this is package 'loo' version '2.10.0'
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking whether package 'loo' can be installed ... [2s/2s] OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking 'build' directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking code files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking loading without being on the library search path ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking whether startup messages can be suppressed ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... [2s/2s] OK
* checking Rd files ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking contents of 'data' directory ... OK
* checking data for non-ASCII characters ... [0s/0s] OK
* checking LazyData ... OK
* checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK
* checking R/sysdata.rda ... OK
* checking installed files from 'inst/doc' ... OK
* checking files in 'vignettes' ... OK
* checking examples ... [1s/1s] OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in 'tests' ... OK
* checking tests ... [15s/8s] OK
  Running 'testthat.R' [15s/8s]
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [10s/16s] OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... [3s/4s] OK
* DONE
Status: OK
* using check arguments '--no-clean-on-error '
* elapsed time (check, wall clock): 0:49
* result classification: OK, errors:no, warnings:no, notes:no

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants